Post-Election Digest – Old, New, Absent, Through

Sign for three candidates for Leetsdale Borough Council posted prior to the May 16 Primary Election. While the candidates probably didn’t intend to mislead anyone, it should be noted that while Mr. Awad and Mr. Frederick have previously served on Council, Mr. Belcastro is the only incumbent among those listed, and as such is the only one here actually seeking “re-election”.

In the six weeks or so since last month’s primary election, what sticks with me as the most distressing result was how many citizens didn’t think it worth their time to participate. According to Allegheny County, only 17.3 % of the county’s registered voters bothered to involve themselves in the process.

Several questions pop into my head as I look at this number. Could this be due to apathy over the process of deciding who serves as elected officials in the most fundamental form of government we have? How about who authorizes the operations of our public schools? Better yet, the judges who decide criminal and civil cases, both big and small?

Could it be that the populace is still trying to recover from the angst of the last general election, and/or the fallout as President Trump continues to run roughshod over the institution of the presidency?

One factor could be that Pennsylvania is one of just 11 states that hold closed primaries, where you can’t necessarily vote for the candidate you want.

Regardless of the reasons, the primary, like this blog, is focused mainly on local government, something that many citizens seem to take for granted, and are often literally ignorant of.

With that in mind, here’s a look at some related issues.

Quaker Valley School Board

Perhaps the most interesting set of races this year was that to determine nominees for QV school board seats, owing to the serious decisions approaching about the future of the high school building.

I have not closely followed or attended any meetings concerning the planning and community input process for the new high school. Along with the district’s own attempts at communication and transparency, I have found an excellent source of information and commentary at the QV School Board Updates group on Facebook.

Individuals active on that group were among those seeking a ballot position in November, and were profiled by the Sewickley Herald in one of several comprehensive stories about the election that appeared in the weeks preceding it. In two of the three board regions, that meant challenging the incumbents.

No one succeeded in those challenges. It appears that Sarah Stoessel Heres from Region II, and Jonathan Kuzma and Daniela Sauro Helkowski of Region I, will retain their seats come November.

Poised to join them from Region III will be newcomer Kathryn “Kati” Doebler, who is also the wife of Aleppo Township Commissioner Matt Doebler. Incumbent board member Marianne Wagner did not seek re-election.

Ms. Doebler described herself to the Herald as “quite neutral” regarding the future of the high school building. She was one of two candidates that I spoke with before the election. Along with the high school issue, I asked her about the disparity in population among voting regions that I wrote about in February 2015, and again in April of that year. Ms. Doebler replied:

I actually hadn’t seen the population numbers broken up this way before, and I agree that it does not seem balanced. It certainly seems to make sense that it be reviewed periodically regardless of the census data, however, since this is always a good time to take stock and reevaluate. I am not the kind of person who never wants to change because “that’s how we’ve always done it”. So, if the data supports a change, then I’m open to it.

The other candidate I spoke with was Leetsdale resident Maria Napolitano. Ms. Napolitano took the time to not only comment on the voting regions issue, but also expanded greatly upon her previously published views about the high school. An excerpt is below:

I am a member of the planning committee for a new school, but I am not convinced that a brand new building is our optimal choice, nor that we, as a community, can afford it…The most responsible thing, in my view, is for the school district to continue the use and maintain the current site to serve the needs of the district. I have heard opinions that having a high school in town is a motivator for people to buy houses there, and helps house prices, and I agree with this. But should the district end up moving ahead with a new site and take all of its operations there, I would like to be very involved in making sure that the site is developed to serve the Leetsdale community, regardless of whether or not I am on the board.

I support either a redistricting that respects natural topography or a system that pegs the number of representatives from a region as proportionate to the number of residents who live there.

Ms. Napolitano came across as accessible, forthright, and articulate. She also appears to be focused not only on the needs of the school district, but the community at large as well. Despite her failure to win a spot on the November ballot, I look forward to her continued involvement in the process of governance and public service – my experience has shown me that you don’t always need a seat at the big table to make a difference.

Tull Property Rises to Prominence – Again

The QV Board, now set to continue its voyage into 2018 with its full crew of expected incumbents intact,  could now move toward the board’s stated intent to pursue a new high school. They took a big step on May 30.

When Thomas Tull stirred the tranquil waters of local property ownership with his 2015 purchase of the Walker estate “Muottas” and several parcels of surrounding land, it was unforeseen how the ripples from that action and subsequent moves could spread to the extent that they have today.

With the QV board’s entry into a conditional purchase agreement for the Tull property, it appears that a big step has been taken to locate a new high school as close to the existing site as could have been realistically envisioned.

According to a comprehensive slide presentation from the May 30 meeting, the board hired a firm to search for and identify compatible parcels of at least 40 acres within the school district boundaries. The advantages of the Tull property were spelled out – included in this was a price breakdown should the district purchase the entire 128 acres for $7.5 Million – a cost per acre of a little over $58,000.

The district has 120 days to enter the property and conduct a study of its suitability for a new high school. They can cancel the agreement without apparent penalty if they determine the land won’t work out. The Herald reported this past week that engineers are well under way with this process, which apparently includes shooing away the curious.

Should QV decide to continue with the purchase, they then have 210 days to obtain all necessary permits and permissions for their intended use – this means that the project will have to take shape in a manner sufficient for three local governments and other entities to approve land use and other permitting processes over the next 8-10 months.

It will be interesting to monitor this process, especially if the school district also acquires “Muottas” as part of any sale. Preservation issues will likely become part of any discussion concerning the future use of the house, and the land around it.

Just as with Thomas Tull’s aborted construction plans, infrastructure improvements to support a new high school may benefit some municipalities, such as new sewer infrastructure connecting the site to the Leetsdale Municipal Authority system.

This will hopefully help to take a little of the sting away from a lot of land coming off the tax rolls.

Leetsdale Council – Replace, Rinse, Repeat

As the sign at the top of this post illustrates, there were a lot of familiar names in the running for Leetsdale Borough Council. Incumbent councilors Thomas Belcastro (Democratic) and Wes James (Republican) were able to secure nominations from their respective voters for one of four total seats being contested in November.

The remaining ballot positions are currently held by three men already tied to council in some fashion.  Democrat Osman Awad is seeking to return to council after losing as an incumbent in 2013. Democrat Ben Frederick is also a former councilor seeking to be elected again. Tom Michael has yet to serve on council, but his wife Linda Michael is a current council member who is not running for re-election.

Incumbent Democrat Michael Nobers was not successful, but may not be completely out of the running, depending upon numerous write-in votes by Republican voters (which actually outnumbered votes for Wes James) that could give Mr. Nobers a position on the GOP side of the ballot. There is recent historical precedent for this activity impacting elections in the borough, owing to poor turnout and ill-advised attempts at humor.

In trying to gain an understanding of why our elected officials seem to originate from the same general group of citizens (including those who lose elections and return to run again), I must look at my own personal situation as much as other factors. I work shifts, and can’t make many evening meetings. My family obligations are significant. Thus, I can’t fault most of us who shy away from seeking elective office.

The seeming lack of fresh faces stepping forward to help govern Leetsdale may be as much a sign that things are going well as of anything else. The borough, despite the absence of a day-to-day authoritative presence in the form of a full-time manager, seems to be operating in an efficient, transparent, and accountable manner. This isn’t to say that there aren’t any problems, but they aren’t significant enough to declare that the ship of state is in distress.

Let’s hope that the return of some of the old guard to the fold doesn’t change that.

Non-Lawyers Swat Lawyer Opponents in District Judge Races

When our local Magisterial District Judge, Bob Ford, started his re-election campaign in earnest very early this year, I was mildly surprised. Judge Ford was unopposed for his election in 2011 – was there someone in the community mounting an unexpected challenge?

The answer was yes…but not just in our area. District Judge races were hotly contested in many areas across the county. Reporting by PublicSource and other media outlets highlighted many of the races that pitted lawyers against non-lawyers for this locally-based position in our justice system, for which a law degree is not a pre-requisite.

In all but two of the races, non-lawyer incumbents (including Judge Ford) or newcomers won both nominations, and are likely assured of their seat come November. Only one lawyer bested his non-lawyer opponent in the Sto-Rox area, and a non-lawyer Democrat will face a Republican lawyer in the fall – in heavily Democratic Wilkinsburg and Edgewood.

Judge Ford’s opponent, Lori Capone-Cirilano, also made being a lawyer an issue in her campaign. Lawyers also challenged two other non-lawyer incumbent justices  – William Wagner in McCandless and Jeffrey Herbst in Monroeville.

I’m wondering if there was a coordinated effort at some level to target these judges based simply on their lack of a law degree, while discounting critical intangibles such as practical experience, time in the community, and relationships with key stakeholder groups.

If so, those coordinating these challenges badly miscalculated the value of a long-standing, positive relationship with the community being served.

“Disincorporation” Proposal Ignores Cooperative Efforts

Last month a task force that included prominent educators, municipal and county officials, and consultants got together to promote the findings of a report touting the potential benefits of disincorporation for many of Allegheny County’s small and/or financially distressed municipalities.

An unsustainable jigsaw puzzle.

Post-Gazette columnist Brian O’Neill shone some light on a Quaker Valley municipality while writing about this whole mess. His initial column featured an elected official in Glenfield Borough, population 205, and her motivation to run for council – to get a better playground for borough children.

Mr. O’Neill also stirred up a little tempest by continuing to feature Glenfield in his writing, this time on May 27 with a column about Glenfield’s Mayor, Michael Cherock, and his unique assessment of Glenfield’s government as akin to a certain fraternal organization, perhaps without the secret handshakes. Mr. Cherock owns a small, successful Pittsburgh architecture firm, and is apparently relocating his family to Sewickley. He seemed to be using the column to announce his intent to resign as Mayor.

This story was followed by a June 1 Letter to the Editor, in which Glenfield Council President David Orbison, himself a psychologist by trade, took Mayor Cherock to task for the manner in which he announced his future plans.

Mr. Orbison termed Glenfield’s current operating posture “nimble and productive”, which may be true. However, that doesn’t prevent the borough from being anachronistic and duplicative in the age of modern governance.

It’s been the contention of this corner since I returned to the area that the continued existence of 130 separate municipal entities is a grossly inefficient waste of taxpayer dollars. Unfortunately, the process advocated by this “task force” places all its eggs in the basket of county government, through the creation of unincorporated areas.

This focus on disincorporation is essentially useless because it ignores the obvious compromise between this “solution” and the status quo – that is the common-sense consolidation of boroughs and townships, and/or the increased use of shared services organized through groups such as the Quaker Valley COG.  This would still allow for the local control of services, while allowing the leverage of economies of scale to optimize efficient service delivery to the taxpayer.

Perhaps it’s time for Glenfield, Haysville, and others in our area to consider their realistic future as independent municipalities.

Sewickley Native, QV Alumna Announces for Congress

While researching Glenfield’s elected officials, I was kind of surprised that there was another psychologist politician in our area besides my congressman, Tim Murphy. Tim and his neighbor in Republican politics in our area, Keith Rothfus, have drawn criticism and protests over their alleged lack of public accessibility and responsiveness to constituents since Donald Trump assumed the Presidency.

While several Democrats in the 18^th District are mulling a run against Murphy in 2018, none have announced their intent as yet. In contrast, Sewickley resident Rothfus already has three Democrats lined up for the chance to take him on next year. Among these three is area native and Sewickley Heights resident Beth Tarasi.

Beth Tarasi and I both graduated from QV as part of the Class of 1978. While we didn’t really travel in the same circles, I remember her as an accomplished athlete and student. From high school she continued to move forward as a student athlete at Pitt, then through Duquesne’s law school, into motherhood, and becoming a successful attorney alongside her father.

Ms. Tarasi, along with fellow Democrats Aaron Anthony of Shaler and Tom Prigg of McCandless, possess varied and diverse backgrounds (Ms. Tarasi is the only lawyer of the three) that will hopefully produce both a spirited primary campaign and a candidate capable and prepared to unseat Mr. Rothfus a year from this coming November.

With the gerrymandering of Pennsylvania congressional districts that is now undergoing a court challenge, this will not be an easy task. Whomever is the Democratic nominee needs to carry forward a message that resonates with voters not only in northern Allegheny County, but from Somerset and Cambria Counties to Beaver County as well.

As for Tim Murphy, the Leetsdale 4^th of July Committee confirmed that he was invited to walk in this year’s parade. Whether or not he shows up, well….

Have a great month ahead.

Change in Sewickley, Part 2 – Picture Shows, Parking, Phones, and Left Turns

A ‘small cell” wireless phone transmitter site, disguised as a utility pole, at Broad and Beaver Streets in Sewickley. These sites are designed to provide coverage through the upcoming transition to 5G wireless networks. Several of these sites can be seen in and around the Sewickley business district.

 

At the end of March, I posted the first in a short series about changes both in progress and on the horizon in Sewickley Borough’s business district. Below are some additional things that I’ve noticed.

First, an update about Character Matters and the proposed Zamagias development. On March 31, Sewickley residents John LeCornu and Anne Clarke Ronce filed a complaint in Common Pleas Court¹ challenging the results of the Sewickley Borough Council hearing of November 21, 2016. As I wrote previously, their challenge is based on alleged violations of the Pennsylvania Sunshine Act.

While it’s still unknown if the Sewickley Herald will devote any resources to report on the dispute, I will provide updates as I can.

The Tull Family Theater – An Impressive Work in Progress

…and its predecessor at Beaver and Locust, taken 40 years ago.

The new Tull Family Theater in Sewickley…

 

Leslie and I attended a screening of Fences during the opening weekend for Sewickley’s new movie house, the long-anticipated Tull Family Theater.

The building has a very clean, corporate feel to it – this was offset somewhat by the warm reception we received from an eager group of staff members, most of them in their late teens or early twenties. The picture and sound quality were excellent, the seats ample and comfortable.

According to their website and additional reporting in the March 9 Herald, the theater has a programming schedule that is robust and varied, showing recent Oscar winners and nominees as well as classic films and specialty screenings of films showcasing the arts. More recent advertising touts some first-run big studio films coming up, along with smaller independent productions.

On April 10, I met with Executive Director Carolina Pais-Barreto Beyers and Communications and Education Director Karen Ferrick-Roman. They make up two of the theater’s three full-time employees.

Ms. Beyers emphasized that their core goal as a community asset is proficiency in cinema, and that the primary purpose of their diverse programming is an attempt to be a cultural center as well as a movie house – representative of the desires of their target audience, with the obvious metric – attendance – defining the direction they will take. Ms. Beyers and Ms. Roman cited an extraordinary response to the film Hermitage Revealed as an example of some of the ways they have been surprised at the success of some of their early film selections.

The Sewickley community is apparently so enamored of their new theater and its programming that the Herald was sufficiently persuaded to name the Tull Theater its 2016 Citizen of the Year. Perhaps the awardee should be more properly identified as the founding hearts and minds of the Village Theater Company, without whose literal and figurative groundbreaking work over several years there would not be a movie theater in Sewickley today. Last week’s Herald account gives credit where it is due.

As the Post-Gazette’s Brian O’Neill wrote last year, “Nonprofit theaters have to think creatively to get butts in seats”. To be fair, the Tull Theater in its infancy seems to be in search of a soul and a personality. The Tuesday Classics and Cultural Screenings are a start, as was a March 19 news release from the theater touting its “initial outreach offering with the Mooncrest Neighborhood Program. Through this program, 50 young children from the Mooncrest Housing Plan will be able to experience a cinema for the first time with Beauty and the Beast.”

The theater is actively seeking other groups or companies to help to sponsor similar outreach to “underserved children and senior adults”. 

The same day I was there, the theater was setting up for an afternoon sensory friendly screening of Beauty and the Beast, in conjunction with Laughlin Children’s Center.

I asked Ms. Beyers to comment on an informal survey I had conducted among independent, non-profit theaters in the Pittsburgh area, which showed that the Tull Theater is the most expensive in terms of full price adult admission. The $11.00 ticket cost also exceeds most multiplex theaters for a 2-D movie, and there is no “matinee” pricing for afternoon screenings.

Stating that “we absolutely need” the price charged for a full-price ticket, Ms. Beyers cited the varied programming, community outreach efforts, and new facility and equipment as contributing factors to the value a customer receives for their ticket price.

Ms. Beyers has a point. While other independent cinemas in our area provide unique and specialty programming experiences, the scope of the Tull’s offerings has been impressive for a group still trying to find what clicks with its customer base.

That exploration will continue with leveraging the theater’s Esmark and Bouchard Family Community Room, named for another large donor. The theater plans to begin using that space for small-scale live performances, as well as rentals for community events.

The Post-Gazette reported recently on efforts across the region to restore historic theater buildings as part of the revitalization of small town business districts. The multi-year efforts by those in Sewickley to bring movies back to “The Village” seems prescient to those going on now in communities like Ligonier and Latrobe. There is also an ongoing effort to restore the former Denis Theatre in Mt. Lebanon.

With its first-rate facility and professional management team, the Tull Theater has the potential to create a truly memorable entertainment experience for “Village” visitors and regulars alike. I’m looking forward to both continued excellence and more creative innovations in programming, but some moderation on price as well.

It’s apparent that the support of the community to fill their seats will be a key to that, and much more.

On Top of That, Let’s Pay More to Park

Now don’t you wait, or hesitate.

Let’s move before they raise the parking rate.

– Free (1970)

The twice-resurrected Sewickley Parking Authority has used its latest lease on life to make some significant changes in how they manage their revenue stream, as well as planning for future improvements.

First created in 1952, killed off, then brought back from the dead in the 1980s and again in 2015, the Parking Authority appears to exist solely as a mechanism for facilitating parking operations and capital improvements, while insulating these activities from the borough’s own fiscal operations.

After some initial hiccups, the transition from parking meters to pay stations appears to have been completed. With it comes a doubling of the parking rates for spaces in the business district, along with a doubling of parking fines.

I’m familiar with the pay station concept as applied by the Pittsburgh Parking Authority. My first experience with Sewickley’s pay stations was a little more problematic than my prior uses – the buttons don’t seem to be as sensitive, and the device itself doesn’t feel as though it can survive the kind of abuse – human and otherwise – that can be meted out over time. We’ll see.

The authority is also feeling pressure from the business community regarding insufficient parking in the business district, and the need to move forward with a planned garage in the location of the existing municipal lot on Green Street. Business representatives that spoke to the Authority board at its February meeting cited the opening of the Tull Theater as a contributing factor to the Village’s parking woes.

The Herald report included cost estimates, depending on the design approved, of anywhere from 6.5 to 7 million dollars for a garage that would add roughly 200 spaces, while not dominating the Village skyline. Sewickley Mayor Brian Jeffe was quoted by the Herald as stating “We do not want this castle in the middle of town”.

I wonder what the Mayor thinks about the “castle” that’s been approved to go up just a block or two away.

Should such a garage be built, what may the additional impact be on parking fees borough-wide? Could we see a return of fees for Saturday parking?

Of greater concern is exactly how much business Sewickley is attracting to justify the increased fees and garage construction. I can understand the concept of Sewickley as a specialty shopping and dining destination, and some of the special events during the year certainly attract some crowds.

How much of that foot traffic translates to real business income, and/or an experience that people are willing to pay a premium for, and not just for parking?

I don’t know the answers, but for those who rely on the health of Sewickley’s business district for their livelihood, I certainly hope that these changes are economically sustainable in the long haul. Groups such as Explore Sewickley are attempting to gauge community sentiment, and encourage involvement in the Parking Authority and its operations.

In the meantime, those of us who choose to visit Sewickley during the business day may have additional factors to consider before deciding if the end justifies the means.

Bordering on the Bizarre – Whose Left is it Anyway?

Over one year ago I reported about proposed changes in left turns from southbound Ohio River Boulevard onto Graham Street and Boundary Street in Sewickley, and their potential impact on motorists trying to reach places not easily accessible by other routes, such as the Critmore Medical Building. I also updated that reporting in a May 2016 post.

In mid-February, I got to witness firsthand some of the rush hour craziness of Route 65 in this area. One the way home from an overnight shift at about 7:45 AM, a car trying to make a left turn into Osborne Plaza from northbound 65 triggered a chain reaction rear-end crash that pinned one driver in her vehicle and sent a box truck into the hillside.

I heard the crash behind me, saw the box truck turn sideways, saw the power lines to my right shudder from the impact of the truck into a pole.

This was one of my few recent exposures to true rush hour traffic along this stretch of roadway. It was unnerving to see so many cars jockeying for lane position, or trying to make left turns across oncoming traffic.

The problems associated with traffic volume that outstrips the design and load capabilities of the roadway involved are a common problem in our area, and Route 65 is one of the more egregious examples, especially in areas such as this one that are too narrow to accommodate a center turn lane.

In response to a request from Sewickley Police, PennDOT has evaluated this area, and has been making recommendations to police and other officials to restrict left turns from southbound Route 65 onto and from Graham Street and Boundary Street, as well as make Graham Street one way from Ackley Terrace to Route 65, thus eliminating turns from the boulevard altogether.

Route 65 at Boundary Street, looking south.

Since last year’s post, the borough has received lots of feedback from citizens and other stakeholders, in the form of comments at council meetings and personal contact with the Mayor and other officials. In March of this year, council debated the proposed restrictions, and arrived at a compromise draft ordinance that would only establish left turn restrictions during rush hour traffic periods.

At their meeting of April 11, council approved this compromise as Ordinance 1351, which went into effect immediately. Borough Manager Kevin Flannery estimated last week that “the signage will be in place within the next 2-3 weeks”.

I believe that the compromise is a good move on council’s part, so long as it can be enforced in an effective manner, while not creating additional confusion or hazards for the traveling public.

It would have been nice if the Herald had followed up on their March 20 story by reporting the eventual outcome, but as of their April 27 edition no story has been published, either online or in print.

As I detailed in April 2016, there are some things left unresolved – the no left turn restriction at Boundary Street may impair the ability of patients and employees at the Critmore Medical Building from being able to legally access the facility from Route 65 during rush hour.

This has a lot to do with the intersection of McKown Lane and Route 65, where left turns are always prohibited. Without additional directional signage, this could leave unfamiliar travelers scrambling to access the facility, and often chancing an illegal left turn out of frustration and/or a lack of knowledge of the area.

This intersection, like Critmore itself, lies within Glen Osborne Borough, and any change to the restriction on McKown would have to come from Glen Osborne council. Review of council minutes for February show that Sewickley Mayor Brian Jeffe and Police Chief Richard Manko addressed council regarding not only left turn restrictions, but the need for increased traffic enforcement along the Route 65 corridor beyond the Glen Osborne boundary. There is some awful recent history involving this stretch of the roadway as well.

Council members stated in March that they would monitor Sewickley’s actions pertaining to left turn restrictions, and make recommendations accordingly. Let’s hope so.

Chief Manko went as far as to opine that his borough should be contracted to provide police service to Haysville and Glenfield, which are currently the only Allegheny County municipalities receiving protection from the Pennsylvania State Police.

While that topic is certainly worth exploring further – and I will – I would opine that police protection in these tiny boroughs is much more than just Route 65, and in the case of Glenfield that role might be better fulfilled by the Ohio Township Police, who currently protect every other municipality surrounding it, excepting Haysville.

It also could be argued by Glenfield residents that their biggest traffic issue may not be Route 65, but Kilbuck Street leading to the on-ramp for Interstate 79 north – a residential neighborhood with a 25 MPH speed limit that is largely ignored.

Have a safe and healthy springtime ahead – it’s election season!

References:

¹  LeCornu et al v. Sewickley Borough, Allegheny County Department of Court Records

Sewickley Herald Digital Archive

 

Change in Sewickley: Character Matters, But to Whom?

My wife and I were both born in Sewickley Valley Hospital during the month of March. While we have both also lived in other regions of the country for extended periods of time, the bulk of our formative years were spent either in Sewickley, or very close to it.

Just as we existed in the same geographic area for many years without being aware of each other, our memories of the Sewickley area hold different significance for each of us.

I am acutely aware of places that aren’t there anymore – 6 of the 7 car dealerships that existed in the Sewickley of my youth. The old house on Walnut that my mother painted pink and opened as a shoe store in 1974. Carroll’s Music Shop and its owner, the late George Habers. The Sewickley Theater and Bill Wheat.

Across from the the theater was Isaly’s, where in the the summer of 1976 I feverishly scooped ice cream for patrons lined up three deep after All the President’s Men let out.

The Sewickley Herald and all of its locations around town, from the 600 block of Beaver to the Flatiron Building at Beaver and Division, to Hegner Way.

Leslie told me that she misses the majestic Sewickley Elementary School, and remembers fondly the Sewickley Pharmacy at Beaver and Walnut, and in particular its proprietor, the late Joseph Dzurec. She also relayed that by age 5 she was well aware of which businesses she was welcome in, and which ones she was not.    

Leslie and I are both in agreement that our favorite place in Sewickley is an enduring edifice that remains a vital, dynamic force in shaping the character of the local community, especially its children – the Sewickley Public Library.

The borough’s signature “Village” business district has been heavy in the throes of change for several years, trying to reinvent itself as an area with unique and trendy retail and restaurant “experiences”, bolstered by unique events – all while trying to maintain a sense of the traditional that appears to be valued by those who call the borough home, as well as by many who visit.

This convergence of ideals and goals is presenting new challenges and opportunities, and is making for some lively interactions, as well as some things that make you go “hmmmm”. This is the first of a short series taking a look at a few of them.

Character Matters, But To Whom?

Full-page ads placed in the Herald editions of February 2 and February 9 signaled the apparent beginning of an effort to garner grassroots opposition to Sewickley Borough’s approval of a condominium development, on land that consisted of vacant houses along Blackburn Avenue and office space along Centennial Avenue between Blackburn and Locust Place – an area colloquially known as “Doctor’s Row”. History buffs may remember that the Herald established temporary quarters in this complex after fire severely damaged their building in November 1972.

According to the October 2016 meeting minutes of the Sewickley Planning Commission, as well as the November 21, 2016 minutes of Sewickley Council, numerous adjacent property owners and borough residents expressed concerns regarding this development, including the height of the buildings, which appear from artist’s renderings to dwarf any other commercial or multi-family structure in the immediate area. Other concerns included parking, light blockage, and a “governor’s drive” for a loading zone.

Both bodies approved the development in the face of this opposition.

Borough Solicitor Richard Tucker advised Council at the January 17 Committee of the Whole meeting that resident John LeCornu had filed an appeal of council’s approval. The initial complaint Mr. LeCornu filed in Common Pleas Court last December can be viewed here.¹  

Earlier this month the nonprofit, unincorporated group “Character Matters”, which had purchased the Herald ads in February, filed a petition to intervene¹, or join, the appeal. President Peggy Standish and Secretary/Treasurer Anne Clarke Ronce are listed on the petition, which states that their membership includes “118 individuals who have an interest in the matter of the construction” of the condominium complex. Character Matters and Mr. LeCornu are represented by Pittsburgh attorney Peter Georgiades.

First contacted on March 16, Mr. LeCornu stated that the initial basis for the appeal is the nature in which council conducted the November 21 meeting, which Mr. LeCornu termed a “mob scene”, and that several speakers were interrupted by an attorney for the developer, Zamagias Properties. 

According to Mr. LeCornu, the court stenographer’s transcript that he obtained gave a greater illustration of the chaotic nature of the hearing, adding that “3 or 4 speakers were shouted down” by this attorney. A copy of this transcript, and other documents pertaining to the development, can be viewed here.¹

Mr. LeCornu stated that the appeal seeks to invalidate the land use hearing and its findings due to violations of the Pennsylvania Sunshine Act, related to the failure of the borough to provide adequate space and time for public comment, and to assure that decorum was maintained. If that was successful, they then intended to pursue the development application on its merits, or the lack thereof.  

During a hearing on March 20 before Judge Joseph James, attorneys for the developers were granted a motion to quash¹ the land use portion of the appeal. Mr. LeCornu stated on March 21 that he and Character Matters can only challenge the results of the meeting based on the alleged violations of the Sunshine Act, and that the penalties against the borough for such a violation may not invalidate any decision reached during that meeting.

Mr. LeCornu lamented the “adversarial atmosphere” that accompanies many of these public meetings, and wondered out loud why many local elected officials seem unapproachable and aloof. He added that his group lacks the financial resources to pursue any further appeals beyond that involving the Sunshine Act.

Multiple attempts to contact Anne Clarke Ronce were unsuccessful. Character Matters does not appear to have a website, nor a presence on any social media platform.    

Herald Absent Once Again…

Alongside any alleged misfeasance on the part of Sewickley Borough and its appointed and/or elected officials is the lack of media coverage of these events as they happened, and continue to occur.  

The Herald did report on the proposed development in July 2016, and again in early October. The latter story included concerns regarding a seemingly questionable, one-person Zoning Hearing Board ruling, along with some of the same issues expressed during subsequent government meetings.

I can find no other Herald reporting on those Planning Commission and Council hearings, or the vocal opposition related to both the project and the approvals granted.

Mr. LeCornu stated that as of March 21, he had not been contacted by any Herald reporter regarding the appeal.

This issue represents to me one of the most visibly contentious involving local government in recent memory – an issue in which the Herald, for as yet unexplained reasons, has been essentially mute.

After Trib Total Media announced layoffs and the closure of some of its weekly newspapers last September, Herald News Editor Bobby Cherry sent a mass e-mail in early November that sought to address rumors that the Herald would be among the weeklies being shuttered. He wrote, in part:

We know local news is important. In the last several weeks — and especially within the last few days — I’ve heard from many readers who have been concerned the Herald was closing. They all indicated how important the Herald is to them for knowing what’s going on in our community — from news to events to sports, etc.

There was one common theme among all of their messages. Here are just a few examples from people:

» “I wouldn’t know anything that was happening locally without the Herald.”

» “I’d never know what was going on in my own town!”

» “Where else would I find out what’s going on in Sewickley?”

No other publication or service regularly reaches as many people in the Sewickley Valley as the Sewickley Herald.

While that last statement may be true, multiple attempts to reach Mr. Cherry in the last week via e-mail and voicemail messages were unsuccessful.

Moving Forward…Maybe

What good is such a pervasive local publication if it fails to consistently report on those issues that so many citizens seem to be concerned about? This isn’t the first time in recent years that the Herald has appeared to drop the ball with regard to controversial decisions made by municipal governments. There needs to be a consistent commitment toward assuring that the Herald is represented at as many official meetings of municipal government as possible.

On the positive side, it does appear that more emphasis is being placed on doing exactly that. The March 16 Herald included reporting on a decision by Sewickley Council that smacks of the questionable if not incredulous, given the controversial issues and significant public dissent in recent months.

Reporter Matthew Peaslee did a good job of making comparisons to other local governmental bodies and their meeting schedules, as well as getting input from a well-known media law advocacy group.

If Sewickley chooses to respond to heightened levels of public involvement by reducing the number of opportunities for the public to learn about and participate in their government, what message does that send?   

Sewickley Council, to its credit, seems to do a competent job of trying to preserve much of the historic character of the borough. Sometimes those efforts seem to defy explanation, especially with regard to recent larger projects. The borough approved the Elmhurst development over neighborhood opposition, and fought one resident in court for several years.

I believe that the character of the borough does matter to them, but character doesn’t pay the bills. When a project that promises a healthy property tax potential comes along, many things must be weighed in the balance of maintaining the kind of community Sewickley desires to be. The question remains if their efforts will be found wanting in the eyes of citizens.  

“Where else would I find out what’s going on in Sewickley?”  By the very nature of the technology available to distribute information via the Internet, the answer is literally lots of places – one reason that print media is finding it hard to stay relevant.  Most local municipalities deserve credit for maintaining some form of robust web presence – even tiny Glenfield Borough offers a comprehensive website that is regularly updated. Several are included in the sidebar of this blog.  

Instead of buying full-page ads in the Herald, Character Matters could have retained a marketing consultant, who could have built a website and e-mail domain, created social media pages, and developed an e-mail newsletter. Smaller, less expensive print ads referring interested readers to the website and social media could also have been added to the mix, to cover all bases.

This combination has the potential to reach more citizens than just print advertising, and also affords the ability to provide frequent updates, solicit participation and/or funding support, and most importantly retain greater control of the message being delivered. 

Even something as simple as a petition on sites such as change.org can be very effective, as evidenced when resident Matt Chapman created one regarding the Sewickley fire horn in 2014.   

Just as ignorance of the law is no excuse, neither is a lack of knowledge regarding the manner in which local government conducts business. While Sewickley officials may have engaged in questionable conduct in certain aspects of this land use approval, concerned citizens have the ability to learn more about those operations through online resources such as the Civics and You PA site, and the Sunshine Act information page.  

As it stands now, any barometer for community outrage may very well be related to the eventual (if not inevitable) construction of the complex. Should Sewickley residents begin to react negatively as the condo buildings begin to rise, I’m wondering if those feelings will translate themselves into a grassroots activism that can be harnessed into political action – much as we are seeing around the country in response to the election of Donald Trump.

Should such feelings indeed materialize, it may be advantageous for groups such as Character Matters to focus their efforts on effective organization, as well as candidate recruitment for the next municipal election cycle.

It will be interesting to see how citizens, their local government, and our local journalists react to those opportunities in the months ahead.

To be continued…

 References:

¹  LeCornu v. Borough of Sewickley, Allegheny County Department of Court Records

Sewickley Herald Digital Archive

Sewickley Valley Historical Society, Nicholas Theis (Elementary School Photo)

February Digest: Fickleness, Fate, Folly, and the Future

The first months of the new year have brought with them new resolve around our house – a need to renew old efforts, blaze new trails, reset and try to re-energize relationships and living arrangements that too often can grow stale and cluttered.

It’s not been easy, and it doesn’t seem to be shaping up as an ‘easy’ year, especially when considering the craziness being displayed by the new administration in Washington. As the focus here is on local activities, we’ll continue with that, with the knowledge that great achievements start with small moves.

Edgeworth Resident Wins Battle in Tree War, Doesn’t Live to See It

Since this time last year, I’ve been following the dispute between an elderly Edgeworth resident and the borough’s Shade Tree Commission over her right to remove three pin oak trees from in front of her residence on Oliver Road. After repeated denials by that commission, Dolores Bassett took her fight to Common Pleas Court, which found in her favor a little over a year ago.

Edgeworth Borough then appealed that decision to Commonwealth Court, which heard arguments last November. On January 24, the court issued a decision upholding the lower court’s finding in favor of Mrs. Bassett’s right to remove the trees.

The opinion issued by Commonwealth Court is an enlightening read for anyone interested in the historical perspectives surrounding land use, local ordinances governing it, and the intricacies of the law as they pertain to language and precedent.

Among other findings, the court ruled that the applicable section of the borough code pertaining to the removal of trees “applies only by its plain text to those situations where the (Shade Tree) Commission may ‘require the removal of any afflicted tree in the public right-of-way’”.

Mrs. Bassett wanted to remove the trees, due in part to their continued compromise of the sidewalk that the borough required her to maintain in a safe condition. This is different from the borough requiring the tree removal.

The court stated that the borough’s attempt to apply the same section of borough code to this situation – “violates the ‘fundamental rule’ enunciated by our Supreme Court ‘that an ordinance must establish a standard to operate uniformly and govern its administration and enforcement in all cases, and that an ordinance is invalid where it leaves its interpretation, administration or enforcement to the unbridled and ungoverned discretion, caprice or arbitrary action of the municipal legislative body or of administrative bodies or officials’”.

In short – how a law is worded really matters. If you need any more evidence, just look at what is happening to some poorly crafted executive orders in Washington.

Borough Councilor Greg Marlovits, who also chairs the Shade Tree Commission, was quoted by the Herald in 2015 that Mrs. Bassett’s issue was an example of the “first-world problems” that consume much of the time of Edgeworth officials. It’s both ironic and unfortunate that the universal ‘problem’ of human mortality serves as a postscript to her victory.

Mrs. Bassett, who had owned the property on Oliver Road for over 40 years, passed away on New Year’s Eve. Her obituary listed surviving relatives from outside the local area.

When asked about any plans that Mrs. Bassett’s heirs may have for her property or the trees, the law firm representing her in this dispute declined comment. Multiple voice mails left for Edgeworth Borough Manager John Schwend were not returned, either to myself or to the Sewickley Herald, which reported on this in their February 9 print edition.

The reticence of both parties likely signals that the dispute has basically ended with Mrs. Bassett’s passing. While I extend my sympathies to her family, I believe it is also important to recognize another recent triumph (see Larry Oswald) by an area landowner over municipal regulations that are ill-crafted and/or poorly administered.

Leetsdale Ordinances (New and Old) Target Renters

In August of last year, Leetsdale Borough Council passed an ordinance that establishes a new system of ticketing both property owners and tenants for violations of borough ordinances concerning code enforcement and conditions of properties, such as snow removal, excessive grass and weeds, and general upkeep.

Excerpt from September 2016 Leetsdale Borough newsletter. 

The new law provides the borough a self-administered means of enforcing its codes and ordinances, independent of the Magisterial District Court. It also enables borough officials to cite tenants, instead of just the property owner.

This past September I approached Leetsdale Council regarding what I thought were several glaring omissions in the ordinance, related primarily to a citizen’s right to due process of law. There was no procedure defined in the ordinance for anyone who might have the “audacity” to contest a ticket, and how that appeal would be received and administered by the borough.

Last month, council approved a policy document establishing an administrative process for tickets issued under the new ordinance. It also includes a requirement that photographic evidence of violations be obtained, and requires an explanation be provided if photos are for some reason unavailable.

Full disclosure – the photo evidence requirement was my idea. Council President Wes James invited my input into the development of the process, which I provided. Not all of my ideas were incorporated into the final document, but I appreciated the opportunity to be able to contribute.

Even if Otto von Bismarck was right about laws being like sausages (“it is better not to see them being made”), local government works better when an informed and engaged citizenry take the opportunity to participate in how their communities are governed. 

While I remain unconvinced of the ordinance’s potential effectiveness, at least those impacted by enforcement will get some reasonable semblance of a fair hearing. 

Additional research into Leetsdale’s ordinances also revealed one that has been on the books for over 10 years, but whose provisions have recently fallen into disfavor due to misapplication elsewhere.

Chapter 230-3, Section F of the Leetsdale Borough Code, enacted in 2006, establishes a mechanism by which a landlord can be forced to evict a tenant after the receipt by the borough of three “disruptive conduct” reports within a calendar year.

This “three strikes” approach fell under scrutiny, and into disfavor, after the ACLU of Pennsylvania sued the Borough of Norristown in 2013 over their application of a similar ordinance that threatened a female tenant and her landlord with eviction and fines over three 9-1-1 calls made for assistance due to the woman’s boyfriend attacking her – the last time putting her in the hospital, due in part to her perceived fear of eviction if she called for help.  

This case, along with similar ordinances in other communities, led to the introduction and passage of Act 200 of 2014, which is “intended to shield residents, tenants and landlords from penalties that may be levied pursuant to enforcement of an ordinance or regulation if police or emergency services respond to a residence or tenancy to assist a victim of abuse or crime or individuals in an emergency.”

Despite the law and publicity generated by the ACLU suit, municipalities continued to attempt enforcement of these types of ordinances, according to a Post-Gazette story from 2015.

Contacted by e-mail in December, Code Enforcement Officer James Ivancik stated the following –

In the years I have been involved with this ordinance in different municipalities that I have worked, it has never been used in the context that it was used in your referenced litigation. It is in place to ensure that neighbors and other persons of reasonable sensibility can have peaceful enjoyment of their premises.

The Borough, the police department and myself are highly empathetic in the use of this ordinance and understand the effects this ordinance may have on the Borough residents.

While I applaud Mr. Ivancik and other borough officials for their stance in this regard, there is no guarantee that this approach will remain in force under future borough administrations. 

Edgeworth’s experience with the courts would seem to send a cautionary signal to governments that do not administer their laws uniformly. One also need look no further than the change of power in Washington for another example.

I hope that Leetsdale council will see these developments as an opportunity to re-evaluate laws that are no longer enforceable, and repeal or revise the ordinances involved.

A Tull Timeline – Property Procurement Becomes a Pivot Point

I’ve been following with interest the arrival of Thomas Tull and his family into the local area. From his purchase of “Muottas” and surrounding acreage in November 2015, Mr. Tull and his representatives have been busy – especially of late.

I’ve spent enough time and space detailing in narrative form the considerable, and sometimes controversial, activities surrounding Mr. Tull’s acquisition of property in the local area. Here’s a timeline of what has transpired over the last 16 months, including recent activity that has more than a few heads being scratched in either curiosity, amazement, or something else:

• November 2015 – Thomas Tull, as the Three Rivers Trust, purchases “Muottas” and surrounding acreage in both Edgeworth and Leet from Dr. and Mrs. Harlan Giles for $5.5 Million.
• December 2015 – Mr. Tull creates controversy by filing for a demolition permit with Edgeworth Borough to take down the historic house.
• January 2016 – Perhaps in response to the community outcry, Mr. Tull announces his intent to move “Muottas” to another site on the property, and build his new house on the site of the old one.
• March – May 2016 – Mr. Tull makes purchases additional properties for $1.5 Million that will connect his existing land to Camp Meeting Road.
• June 2016 – Operations begin to clear trees and construct a roadway connecting Camp Meeting Road to the site of the proposed construction and house-moving.  
• July 2016 – Leet Township’s Zoning Hearing Board, before a standing-room audience, conducts a hearing July 11 on the application by Mr. Tull to establish a “gentleman’s farm” on his acreage in the township. 11 days later, the application for a variance to build the farm is withdrawn, but construction of a sugaring shack and an apiary continue on a portion of the property near Walker Park.
• August 2016 – Mr. Tull purchases “The Farm” in Robinson Township, Washington County, for $3.65 Million.
• January 2017 – The new farm operation, re-christened Rivendale Farms, is profiled at length along with an interview with Mr. Tull in a January 8 Post-Gazette story. Mr. Tull describes the property as a “working farm”, and indicated that his family would not be residing there. The operations as described in the P-G story certainly give that impression. 

Along with that reporting was information that most, if not all construction activity has ceased at the “Muottas” site –

          “We love the Sewickley community but when it became clear that some of the things we wanted to do wouldn’t be a good fit, we pivoted out of that,” Mr. Tull said.

           A foundation was also poured for a new modern house for Mr. Tull, his wife Alba and their three children. In November, Mosites Construction Co. stopped building the house.

           “It was going to take three years to build,” Mr. Tull said. “I am out of the business of building homes.”

• February 2017 – The P-G reported on Valentine’s Day that Mr. Tull purchased the nearly 15,000 square-foot house built by Glen Meakem in 2007 along Woodland Road in Edgeworth. This house was built on the site of the 1854 Thomas Leet Shields house and surrounding outbuildings, which were demolished for this newer construction.

Included with this reporting is information that Mr. Tull intends to place the relocated “Muottas” and surrounding acreage on the market “soon”.

This does not include the sugaring shack or apiary, which are on a separate 42 acre parcel with the owner listed as 76CHSUGAR LLC. This may refer to the reported partnership between Mr. Tull and former Steeler Chris Hoke in the operation of this facility, as well as Rivendale Farms.

The latest P-G story included recent photos of “Muottas”, moved to a new foundation but missing the large porch that adorned the house in its original location. Perhaps this will be restored in the future by whomever acquires the house.

One can hope that those in the community that remain committed to historic preservation will continue to monitor activity involving this property, and that more local governments will seek to codify the preservation of historic properties within their boundaries.

The saga of acquisition, construction, relocation, and now what amounts to abandonment is almost dizzying in both the speed and expense involved. Along with the now-postponed construction of the new house where “Muottas” once stood will likely come the cancellation of significant sewer improvements for the property and through the Lark Inn Fields subdivision of Leetsdale.

Despite all this, I wish the Tull family a warm welcome to the Sewickley Valley. Hopefully they will enjoy Mr. Meakem’s house as much as they would have enjoyed their own. Perhaps when we take in a movie at the Tull Family Theater, or enjoy a breakfast that includes locally sourced honey and pure maple syrup, we can then truly appreciate the contributions made by their arrival to this area thus far.

The Future at Work

As it happens, we actually did get to see a movie during opening weekend at the “Jethro”. As one who remembers when Sewickley lost its movie house, having one again will hopefully enhance the character of the community for years to come. I’ll have more to say next time.

As readers of the Herald have been reminded by full-page ads in recent weeks, “character matters“. I’ll have more to say about that as well in the weeks ahead.

Sewickley’s future is inexorably tied to its past – we all need timely reminders of this fact.

To conclude on a positive note, this corner has also followed with interest the exploits of Leet Township teenager Elise Truchan, and the saga of her treehouse.

This week’s Herald features Miss Truchan making the most of her experience, by teaching others about doing the same.

Congratulations to Elise for continuing to make lemonade out of the lemons served up by her local government. Well done.

Best wishes and Godspeed.

Quotations, Tribulations, and the Carol of the Bells

Don’t quote me on that.

 

I hope that your holiday season was joyous and uneventful.

It’s been quite a while since I last posted here, and by many accounts since then our world has changed dramatically with the results of November’s election. I was upset with the outcome, more so than any election that I can remember.

Granted that we had two extremely flawed candidates, but the winner is argumentative, unqualified, and is surrounding himself with people who do not have this country’s best interests at heart. Mr. Trump can be, and will be, manipulated by these people, and we will be the worse for it in terms of our standing in a world that is increasingly shrinking.

Ironically, it was us that did the shrinking, by pioneering mass communication and computing technologies that have made the world smaller via instantaneous, almost ubiquitous global communication.

According to noted author and New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman, we have also facilitated the “flattening” of the world through our development of data networks, satellite and other connectivity, and an Internet to bring it all together.

Mr. Friedman laid this out very well in his 2006 book The World is Flat, and continued with some very valid trepidations when considering the election and recent revelations about it –  

My personal dread derived from the obvious fact that it’s not only the software writers and computer geeks who get empowered to collaborate on work in a flat world. It’s also al-Qaeda and other terrorist networks.

The playing field is not being leveled only in ways that draw in and superempower a whole new group of innovators. It’s being leveled in a way that draws in and superempowers a whole new group of angry, frustrated, and humiliated men and women.

Those “angry, frustrated, and humiliated men and women” just leveraged the democratic process to put into power a group of people who will do serious damage to the fabric of our nation, unless they are challenged at every turn toward intolerance, warmongering, and the dissolution of human rights and civil liberties gains hard-fought for over the last 60 years.

My biggest fear? Economic conflicts with Russia, China, and others escalating into war, and the reinstatement of the draft in response to it.

For now, I defer to others with more time and diligence who follow this. I will say that like many other citizens I have made a contribution to the ACLU. Before going back to the local beat, some words for my congressman, Tim Murphy – Nice job on the mental health bill. I’ll be watching your voting record very closely from now on.  

QV Begins Full Court Press on High School

The For Sale signs in front of two houses in the 700 block of Beaver Street in Leetsdale is but one tangible indicator that the Quaker Valley School District is moving in earnest to find a place to construct a new high school building.

The district has retained education planners and design consultants to gather input from the community regarding a new high school project, which according to other reporting may require upwards of 42 acres of land. The existing vacant land at the high school, such as the athletic fields, are not suitable according to the district as they are part of the 100 year floodplain.

For me, this is sounding very much like a suitable tract of land may not be available within the district’s borders, and that QV may have to consider obtaining land in a bordering municipality. There is precedent for this in at least two other Allegheny County school districts.  

I really can’t comment otherwise on the district’s efforts, because I haven’t attended any of the information sessions. I do believe that QV deserves credit for trying to communicate with citizens and garner support through information gathering, and seeking to build consensus on exactly what students need and what taxpayers can afford.

Considering the history of previous attempts to build new schools in this district, it’s not going to be an easy sell.  

More information on this effort can be found here and here.

Managing the Quotation Game

Whoso would be a man, must be a nonconformist. He who would gather immortal palms must not be hindered by the name of goodness, but must explore if it be goodness. Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind.                                           –  Ralph Waldo Emerson

The staff at Quaker Valley High is also taking steps to assure that last year’s yearbook controversy isn’t repeated. In a letter to students obtained via a Right To Know request, QVHS Principal Deborah Ricobelli outlined the process that seems to have as its goal a thoroughly sanitized, more politically correct publication this time around.

Ms. Ricobelli advised the students that “a representative group of senior students” assisted in the development of a system that includes a democratic process by all seniors to select submitted quotes for inclusion in the senior photo section.

In addition to this, seniors may submit a quotation and other information for a “separate senior section with information about college/work/future plans and the personal quotes…Information related to personal yearbook quotes will be relayed sometime in 2017.”  

Considering the relatively early deadlines associated with assuring that the printed yearbook is in the hands of students before the end of the school year, I’m wondering if this “separate senior section” will be a companion to – not part of – the published yearbook. This could be something that can be more easily forgotten in posterity should controversy ensue once again.  

Mentioned more than once in all this is a key admonishment – “The school reserves the right to omit any inappropriate quotes.”  Once again, “inappropriate”, like “reasonable”, is in the eye of the beholder.

Considering the gems of wisdom that left the lips of our President-Elect during the campaign, the bar of “inappropriateness” may need to be set in an entirely different fashion in the years to come.

Camp Horne Reopens, An Unstable Anniversary

Camp Horne Road reopened just before Thanksgiving. During the closure, several businesses who felt a serious impact as a result of the work made their feelings known to local media.

These complaints dovetailed with the 10th Anniversary of an event that affected traffic patterns in this area in a catastrophic manner – the huge landslide at the former Dixmont State Hospital site, which at the time was being redeveloped into a Wal-Mart. Had I noticed this anniversary approaching, I might have done a bit more research and posted something about it, as I was not living here at the time and would have loved to have learned more. Having read several other media accounts over the years, the biggest impression I got from it was a vocal community activist group saying “we told you so”.

Dixmont / Wal-Mart site, circa 2014. (Google Maps)

A comprehensive 2008 report from the Pa. Legislature details the scope and impact of the slide, the response to it, and the concerns of the surrounding citizens and community in advance of it. 

The site today appears to have been completely mitigated and stabilized, as best as engineers and other experts can. It serves as a sort of quiet monument to the dangers of unbridled, ill-advised growth for growth’s sake. 

Leet, Bell Acres Make a Quiet Dispatch Transition

40 years ago I was a junior at Quaker Valley High, working after school during the holiday season at the old Select Food Market at the corner of Beaver and Division Streets in Sewickley. This space now hosts Clearview Credit Union, a dance studio, and the Sharp Edge Bistro.

I remember several interesting people who worked with me there – a classmate from school, the owner and his son, and the grocery manager, who at the time was Chief of the Fair Oaks Volunteer Fire Department in Leet Township.

There was a police scanner in his office in the back of the store, tuned to the Beaver County fire dispatch channel. Back then, every siren and pager for all county fire departments were tested at 6:00 PM – every night of the week. The succession of radio paging tones took several minutes to complete – I coined it the “carol of the bells”.

Leet Township and neighboring Bell Acres Borough were part of that “bell choir”. Despite being located wholly in Allegheny County, these two communities have utilized Beaver County dispatchers for at least the last 40 years and well before.

The reason for this was likely the historically established population centers of these two towns being focused in the Fair Oaks area of Leet, and along Big Sewickley Creek Road in Bell Acres. These areas received their telephone service from Ambridge, and today they sit (along with roughly half of Leetsdale) within the 724 area code.

As technological advances have made these divisions largely irrelevant, the arrangement with Beaver County for dispatch services was apparently becoming more unjustified from a fiscal standpoint. Dispatch services for Allegheny County municipalities are provided without cost to them by the county’s 9-1-1 center, which is funded in part by revenue from the 9-1-1 surcharge that is charged on every telephone line. These funds are administered by the Commonwealth, through the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA).

According to Leet Township Manager Wayne Hyjek, Beaver County and Allegheny County were unable to reach an agreement on the transfer of surcharge funds to compensate Beaver’s provision of these services. As a result, Allegheny County began providing 9-1-1 and dispatching services to Leet and Bell Acres on December 8.

Full Disclosure: I am employed by Allegheny County as a 9-1-1 Dispatcher.

Scanner radio listeners and hobbyists in the immediate area may notice the new locations and responder units on the Allegheny County frequencies, but aside from those changes it doesn’t seem as if anything newsworthy has come out of the transition itself, if the lack of local media coverage is any barometer of that.

The change has thus far appeared transparent to citizens, which from an operational and service provision standpoint is a good thing.

The Most Exclusive Nuisance Bar Around?  

The Edgeworth Club describes itself on its website as “a private social and recreational club set among the stately homes of historic Sewickley, Pennsylvania”.

Recent actions by Edgeworth Borough Council give the indication that the resident of at least one stately home does not share the club’s enthusiasm for its proximity.

In October, council meeting minutes stated that the General Manager of the club wrote council stating that –

..a neighbor had complained about the noise level emitting from the Edgeworth Club after 10:00 pm. The neighbor threatened to turn the Edgeworth Club in to the PA Liquor Control Board for violating LCB noise regulations which are designed for nuisance bars. (Club General Manager Brett) Ninness stated that he feared the Club may be in jeopardy of losing their liquor license if the neighbor filed unwarranted claims with the Liquor Control Board. Mr. Ninness asked for the Borough to pass a Resolution stating that Edgeworth Borough enforces its own noise ordinance as opposed to the Liquor Control Board.

A municipality can actually petition the LCB to have its own noise ordinance replace the nuisance provisions of the liquor code, thus enabling more local control over enforcement. 

Edgeworth Council was only too happy to accommodate the club’s request during their November meeting, unanimously passing a resolution to begin this process with the LCB –

According to Mr. Ninness the application proposed by the Edgeworth Club was being submitted as a defense mechanism for the establishment against unfounded complaints…Chief (John) English also stated that the Edgeworth Club has always been accommodating when requests regarding noise levels have been made by the Police Department in the past.

As much as this approach seems to make sense to prevent the potential misapplication of a state regulation by supplanting it with local law, I still have to wonder about the outright dismissal of the neighbor’s complaints as “unwarranted” and “unfounded”. 

Maybe the resident(s) involved will have their turn before council in the future.

Nearly Ready at the Jethro

40 years ago this past summer I was working my first real job, behind the counter at the Isaly’s in Sewickley. The store was in the space currently occupied by Bruegger’s Bagels, across the street from the old Sewickley Theatre. One of my most memorable evenings was when All The President’s Men was showing, and the crowd that let out after the early evening screening really wanted ice cream. People were lined up 3 deep, and we didn’t finish up until very late.

Before its closing in 1979, the theatre was the anchor of nightlife in “The Village”. When Leslie and I go into Sewickley, it’s usually during the day, although we did enjoy watching a Pens game recently at Sidelines Sports Bar.

In about a month, numerous years of planning, fundraising, and preparation will come to fruition as the Village Theater Company opens the Tull Family Theater complex on Walnut Street. Since my post in March on the infusion of $500,000 by the Thomas and Alba Tull Foundation, the theater company has ramped up its preparations, and brought on expert staff and creative leadership as well.

Noteworthy to me are the changes in relationships that a healthy bank account can bring. Prior to the Tull Foundation’s involvement, Village Theater Company was reportedly aligned with Pittsburgh Filmmakers, but in the wake of the cash infusion, and reported financial problems at the Filmmakers, the company instead aligned themselves with the same film programmer used by the Manor Theater in Squirrel Hill. Leslie and I visited there earlier this month to see the film Loving. The Manor is an impressive facility with some excellent offerings – hopefully we can expect the same from the Tull theater.

The Pittsburgh Filmmakers do deserve much credit for their continued offerings at their various venues around town. I drive by the Regent Square Theater regularly, and got a smile from their recent week-long showing of the holiday classic It’s a Wonderful Life – for free, with a suggested donation of food items that took up one side of the theatre lobby.

It was one way for people to enjoy this great story, and do something for those in need, before Mr. Potter moves into the White House.

While our main source of independent film viewing is just down the street at the library, I’m anticipating that we’ll be able to take in a film at Sewickley’s much-awaited new venue. I wonder if the new Crazy Mocha across the street will be ramping up their staff in anticipation of post-movie foot traffic.

There’s plenty more to say, and perhaps a reboot of sorts is needed here in response to what is about to happen with our national government. I’m looking forward to facing the joys and challenges of life in the coming year, whatever they may be.

Have a great new year ahead.

Summer / Autumn Decennial Digest

The days are moderating into the familiar, blessed coolness that brings with it the anticipation of harvest festivals, apple cider, and pumpkin spice everything.

I’ve been collecting things to summarize – things that I’ve touched upon before, things that are new, people who have departed (recently and long ago), and at the last, reflecting on a decade of blogging and what’s ahead.

The minstrel in the gallery
Looked down upon the smiling faces.
He met the gazes, observed the spaces
Between the old men’s cackle.

Gentleman Farmer’s Dream Deferred

The hubbub that surrounded billionaire Thomas Tull’s attempt to develop a small working farm on his newly-acquired properties in Leet Township was fleshed out before the township’s Zoning Hearing Board, along with a packed house of residents, on July 11.

Cars and people pack the Leet Township Municipal Building for the Zoning Hearing concerning the Tull gentlemen’s farm, July 11.

 

Just 11 days later, Mr. Tull’s representatives pulled the plug on the bulk of the farm project. At that time, Leet Assistant Manager Betsy Rengers confirmed that the permit applications for the extensive fencing had also been withdrawn. Contacted again in late September, Ms. Rengers stated that no additional filings for permits or variances had been made by Mr. Tull or his representatives.

There are some improvements underway on the Edgeworth side of the property. The July meeting minutes of Edgeworth Borough Council indicated that Mr. Tull intends to build a sugaring shack for maple syrup production on the property.

Recent contact with an Edgeworth Borough representative indicated that this project is still under way, and also includes an apiary for honey production. The other aspects of the farm operation, including a small dairy, have been earmarked for another location, possibly in the Robinson area.

Mr. Tull seems to be demonstrating with this decision (along with the earlier one not to demolish the historic house that sits on his property) a continuing desire to keep from offending his neighbors as much as is practical. That’s a good thing.

So while the Tull property will likely not become the land of milk and honey, it still stands to be quite the project. Judging from the signage posted at the most conspicuous access point to his property, Mr. Tull has made it clear that local curiosity-seekers need not apply.

Entrance to Construction Site for Tull Estate.

He brewed a song of love and hatred,
Oblique suggestions and he waited.
He polarized the pumpkin-eaters,
Static-humming panel-beaters…

 

Edgeworth Updates – Swift, Silent, and Similar

The tempest that was the Edgeworth Square Development, which first proposed a McDonald’s and then a Chipotle until disagreements between property owners created a snag in the process, was resolved and quickly approved by Edgeworth Council this past April – and there’s a reason you may not have heard about it until July, when it was reported by the Sewickley Herald.

The well-written story outlined the traffic control measures that would have to be made within the multi-owner commercial complex in order for the development to commence, but nothing substantive appears to be happening as yet, and Edgeworth Manager John Schwend told the Herald that he wasn’t sure if a Chipotle was still in the offing, or not.

The manner in which the development was approved was as stealthy as the manner in which the Herald reported the agreement between Esmark (Jim Bouchard) and Edgeworth Real Estate Associates (Grant Scott, Drs. Wilcox and Felix) was reached:

Edgeworth Real Estate Associates later filed a lawsuit and Esmark filed a request to intervene, which was approved Feb. 29. Both parties agreed to work out an agreement to the development to avoid having to go to court.

Edgeworth Borough Manager John Schwend said council voted in April to approve the terms of the settlement.

Nothing about the development was on April’s agenda – per the April minutes Council approved it at the end of the meeting, after returning from executive session to discuss litigation. Edgeworth resident Mike Tomana relayed these observations at the time:

They approved a settlement in executive session regarding Hazel Lane litigation that caused the development to be on hold; then came out of executive session to approve the development.   Obviously done in such a way that the residents could not have known what was happening. Very disappointing and intentional since the vote was not on the agenda.

Looks like council pulled a “fast one” like they did with the fire department in 2011. And just like with that episode, the media was slow to get to the story and report on it.

What will be interesting to see now is whether or not anything actually gets built there.

Historic Preservation and Representative Government

The initial controversies about the Tull development, which I detailed at the beginning of this year, raised anew the 20-plus year old controversy regarding the lack of a historic preservation ordinance in Edgeworth.

The Herald also reported in July about a renewed initiative by the Sewickley Valley Historical Society to establish a historic district in Edgeworth through passage of an ordinance, similar to that proposed by the group Edgeworth Preservation in the 1990’s.

Quoting the Herald account:

Borough manager John Schwend said when people came to council to protest the potential demolition of Muottas and asked council to create a historic district, the response was: “If this is something a majority of the residents of Edgeworth are interested in, we’re more than happy to do that.”

People spearheading the protest against demolition of the Walker house were told to come up with a proposal and show it has support, Schwend said.

“You need to come up with a good proposal and see if there is a majority of support in the residents of the borough,” he said.

This is very similar to what the borough stated nearly 20 years ago – gather consensus first, then come to us. Sounds to me as if the Historical Society may need to do just that – leverage the tools of the day to elicit opinion from Edgeworth citizens, and make sure those opinions are quantified and effectively communicated to those elected representatives on council, who are charged with representing their constituency, and presumably keep track of their opinions as a matter of routine.

Then it will get interesting.

Litigation Front

The minutes of the Edgeworth Council meeting of July 19 were filled with accolades for police personnel that were retiring and/or newly promoted, and included discussions, both pro and con, about historic preservation.

Perhaps not noticed as much was a line item in the bills to be paid – a settlement payment to Scott and Ryan Fetterolf for $135,000. This stems from an altercation between these men and an Edgeworth Police officer in August 2013, near the Edgeworth Club.

The men were subsequently acquitted or had charges withdrawn, leading to one filing suit against the borough in 2015. The settlement approved in July is the apparent resolution of the matter. The involved officer no longer works for Edgeworth Borough, and was himself convicted of Aggravated Assault for an incident in Bellevue near the end of 2013.

On another continuing legal front, Edgeworth’s appeal of a Common Pleas Court decision allowing an 85-year old resident to cut down three trees damaging her sidewalk is still pending. Oral arguments are scheduled before Commonwealth Court in November.

 

He pacified the nappy-suffering, infant-bleating,
One-line jokers, T.V. documentary makers
(overfed and undertakers).

Sunday paper backgammon players
Family-scarred and women-haters.

Last Month in Personal History

Speaking of Edgeworth, a 30-year retrospective of stories from a September 2006 Herald  (Page 4) brought back a couple of difficult memories from 40 years ago last month.

My family was living on Maple Lane in Edgeworth the morning of Saturday, September 18, 1976. I was up fairly early getting ready for that afternoon’s football game as a member of the Quaker Valley High School band.

When I came outside to meet my ride, I noticed that Shields Lane was closed off at Maple, and there were police vehicles staged down the road. It wasn’t until later that day that we found out that the body of a girl had been found in a yard there.

Heidi Morningstar, age 12, had allegedly been taken from her Ambridge home the day before, was strangled, and left in the yard of what was then the Zug estate. While subjects were arrested and charged in 1979, those charges were dismissed in 1982.

The Morningstar case was featured by the Beaver County Times in an October 2015 series on cold case murders.

Earlier that same month, Eric Swenson, age 16, tried to cross Route 65 between Orchard Lane and Hazel Lane and was struck by a motorcycle. This was before there was a traffic signal at the Hazel Lane intersection. Eric was hospitalized for about a month before he died from his injuries.

Eric and I were well acquainted, but not especially close. Nevertheless, I tried to get the ball rolling for what I saw at the time as a serious deficiency for pedestrians, especially Sewickley Academy students who often crossed the highway to get to Burger King. I wrote a letter to the Herald (Page 4A), and circulated petitions in places such as my father’s beauty salon and the faculty lounge at the Academy’s Senior School.

Despite these and other entreaties from Edgeworth Borough councils at the time, it took PennDOT until 1987 to finally acquiesce to the installation of a signal at Hazel Lane. And nearly thirty years after that, we’re still talking about pedestrian and vehicle safety on Route 65.

Freshly day-glow’d factory cheaters
(salaried and collar-scrubbing).
He titillated men-of-action

Belly warming, hands still rubbing                               On the parts they never mention.

 

EpiPen Follies

When I posted almost two years ago about the political maneuvering behind legislation regarding the stocking of epinephrine injectors in schools, I did not think that the story would explode the way it did in August and September.

Like the price of the EpiPen, which almost doubled in that 2 year period, the fallout was ugly and nearly constant for several weeks, and continued this past week with accusations about the overcharging of government benefit plans.

In my original post, I detailed the activities of at least one quasi-Astroturf advocacy group, funded in part by the drug companies marketing epinephrine injectors, in lobbying lawmakers at the federal and state levels.

According to Reuters, Mylan also actively recruited food allergy bloggers to write about these issues, by conducting blogger “summits” that included expensive meals, editing assistance by professional PR staff, and advice on how to give interviews, etc.

In the wake of the fallout from Mylan’s actions, many bloggers feel like they were used. I don’t blame them.

The only other revelation about this whole debacle came courtesy of the Eat That Read This newsletter. Mylan CEO Heather Bresch, the target of the wrath of parents, health care advocates, and congressmen,  commutes to the company’s Southpointe headquarters from a residence in Sewickley Heights.

 

Then he called the band down to the stage
And he looked at all the friends he’d made.

They Have Gone Home

There were two noteworthy departures from this mortal coil over the summer. The first was someone I didn’t expect to meet, the second someone I worked with who accomplished much.

The Rev. John Zingaro was a Presbyterian minister, originally from Ellwood City, who traveled the world as a missionary, and was a well-loved pastor of churches in the midwest and elsewhere. He returned to the Pittsburgh area for cancer treatment, and was a part of the stated supply of the Pittsburgh Presbytery. This brought him to the pulpit of St. Andrew’s in Sewickley on multiple occasions over the last year, where he was engaging, articulate, insightful, and courageous in the face of a battle that he was losing.

Rev. Zingaro passed away in mid-July. He preached his last sermon on June 26 at Northmont Presbyterian in the North Hills. Luckily, this church records these sermons and posts them online.

Trained as a writer and journalist prior to his call to ministry, Rev. Zingaro was the Sports Information Director at his alma mater, Point Park University, officiated several different sports, and made no secret of his status as a Pirates fan. For several years he was a fixture at the Bucs’ fantasy camp.

John Zingaro was a man in full. A link to his blog remains in the sidebar of this one.

Cancer also took an energetic achiever who was highly respected in her field, and accomplished much despite daunting personal adversity. Elizabeth Wertz Evans passed away in August, and left an indelible mark on her profession and those who practiced it with her, regardless of the role they assumed.

I am privileged to have worked with Liz, and even though this was over 20 years ago, her energy and success in the face of significant loss and transition is worth some contemplation and appreciation.

Another multi-talented former colleague from those days, John Chamberlin, runs the popular local website yajagoff.com. He wrote a poignant tribute to Liz that says it better than I ever could.

Camp Horne Closure Complaints

After expanding on the closure of Camp Horne Road in late August, it wasn’t surprising to see some local businesses complaining of a loss of business as a result of the project. Several businesses have put signs out along or near Route 65 advertising that they are still open, or offering discounts. Gas prices at the BP / Seven-Eleven at the 65 / Camp Horne intersection are below those at other stations along Route 65.

Perhaps the county will coordinate better with local businesses and other stakeholders in the future, especially when it comes to identifying and posting detours. This includes the  upcoming closure of the Emsworth Bridge over Camp Horne Road.

Ten Years Gone

I began this blog in September 2006 in the midst of transition, with the specter of loss looming over the horizon of my life and the lives of my family. Since then there have been significant personal joys, tremendous loss and grief, triumphs over adversity, and disagreements approaching intransigence. In other words, life itself.

Through all of this I have strived to continue with my writing as an outlet, while at the same time questioning both my role as an observer and advocate (along with a smattering of activism), identifying perhaps with the “Minstrel in the Gallery”, the lyric of which is interspersed throughout this post.

During these 10 years, the changes in my life have resulted in a refocusing of sorts, along with re-thinking what I’m really here to do. I see near mirror images of myself 25 years ago in the course of doing my work each day, and it’s unsettling to realize that in some places people embrace change, and in others they just give it a hug while remaining steadfastly the same.

One perspective was introduced to me by my current wife, who largely avoids the news. This occasionally puts us at loggerheads, especially when I’m exploring social media and/or researching something that she (and others) may consider inconsequential, or when I could be (or should be) doing something else.

I have tried to understand her thinking, which has its roots in various places in scripture, such as the Book of Ecclesiastes. Chapter 3 may sound familiar to those with an affinity for 60’s music. As someone whose professional and personal life has been driven by history and our place in it, this is difficult to truly get a grasp on, but I do sense the value of putting the world in its place, and keeping busy with things that really matter. Like her.

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton do not count among those things.

Perhaps this is a contributing factor to this blog being reduced to an average of a single post a month. Another is the fact that we have a granddaughter that we love, and care for on a regular basis. While I resist the urge to plaster her photo onto my blog repeatedly, this did not prevent the Herald from putting her on Page One a few weeks back. Nice picture.

We’ll see how things go. Best wishes for a pleasant Autumn.

The minstrel in the gallery
Looked down on the rabbit-run.
And threw away his looking-glass
Saw his face in everyone.

– Jethro Tull (1975)

 

Camp Horne Closure Highlights Commuter Crunch, Other Issues

Construction season is one of the more vexatious components of any summer in Pennsylvania. The above-average temperatures of recent weeks have made the daily commute into town just that much more of a chore than it already is.

Since around Memorial Day, the section of Route 65 southbound from the McKees Rocks Bridge has been impacted by a major reconstruction project. In mid-July, this project actually closed those southbound lanes and shunted traffic down onto Beaver Avenue.

Commuters on Route 65 faced with construction or traffic delays typically have an easy alternate route into town, by accessing Camp Horne Road, AKA the Green Belt, in Emsworth and traveling the two miles to I-279, AKA the Parkway North.

My route, however, takes me to the much-improved Route 28, and there are no easy ways to transition onto 28 from I-279 South, especially since PennDOT closed the ramp onto 28 North from East Ohio Street in late July.

Taking the Veterans Bridge to Crosstown Boulevard, with the intent of accessing I-376 via the Boulevard of the Allies, is complicated by traffic backing up to access the construction-laden Liberty Bridge. The traffic to get to the bridge often blocks access to the Allies off-ramp.

As a result of what increasingly feels like a conspiracy of congestion, I have endured the southbound Route 65 detour to get to Route 28.  Thanks to a questionably timed construction project that began a week ago this past Monday, many commuters are having their drives complicated even further.

On August 15, Allegheny County Public Works closed Camp Horne Road about a quarter of a mile in from Route 65 for about 3 months. According to the Tribune-Review, this insult to commuter injury comes with a recommended detour of nearly 8 miles – taking motorists up I-79 and across Mount Nebo Road all the way to Lowries Run Road, where it becomes Camp Horne at the I-279 junction.

The Camp Horne Road closure, marked with a red X, and the recommended detour (in blue) to get around it.        Google Maps

The County’s Public Works Department has been responsive and professional when I’ve made inquiries of them in the past, and this time was no exception. My question to them was as follows:

Can you advise how much coordination is being done with PennDOT on these and other projects, so as not to negatively impact vehicle traffic on multiple routes?

This is especially noteworthy due to the current closure of Route 65 south of the McKees Rocks Bridge until sometime in the fall, and the use of Camp Horne to I-279 by many commuters as an alternate route into the city.

It would appear that commuters are running out of options due to multiple projects that affect several primary routes of travel in the same general area at the same time.

Deputy Director Michael J. Dillon replied:

We have been coordinating this project with PennDOT and they are aware this work is going on.  The detour we are posting for this closure does not conflict with any current work PennDOT is doing.  I apologize for the inconvenience this project will cause but the wall supporting Camp Horne Road is quickly detreating (sic) and if it is not replaced could collapse and result in an emergency closure of the roadway.   Thank you.

If the work needs to be done now, then that’s when it has to be done. Amidst the grudging acceptance of this fact comes frustration on several fronts related to the manner in which construction and maintenance occurs, and how it is communicated to the motoring public. Among these are:

Detours – As illustrated above, the posted detour for this closure, while chosen to accommodate all vehicles, is hideous nonetheless. Mr. Dillon explained the county’s rationale to the Trib: 

Dillon said the county likes to use either roads it owns or state roads for such detours because they’re capable of handling larger traffic loads, as well as heavy trucks.

Dillon encouraged drivers to follow the posted detour and to avoid searching for shortcuts.

“There are neighborhoods and communities in that area, and those roads aren’t designed to handle that kind of traffic,” he said.

An alternate route (in yellow) for passenger cars involves accessing Roosevelt Rd. from Mt. Nebo Rd., then turning left onto Crawford Rd. just past Avonworth Elementary School. Crawford connects to Camp Horne at ACORD Park.  Watch out for the speed bumps on the lower part of Crawford.                     Google Maps

As Mr. Dillon stated, the ‘official’ detour is the only one suited for all manner of vehicles. If there is any positive to be taken from this, large trucks that would normally take Route 65 to get to Camp Horne will now be on Interstate 79.

This should not, however, preclude the identification of suitable alternate routes for passenger vehicles, some of which are illustrated above and below.

Another alternate route from Route 65 is to make a left onto Hazelwood Ave. in Emsworth at the traffic signal by The Dog Stop. Make the next right onto Center Ave. and follow to a left turn on Locust St. at the Emsworth Municipal Building. Make a left at the end of Locust onto Roosevelt Rd. and follow it to Crawford Rd., as illustrated in the previous photo.     Google Maps

Some alternate routes are NOT suitable for a lot of traffic – they are just too narrow and steep. Examples are Toms Run Road, which connects Route 65 with Roosevelt Road from just south of the Glenfield Viaduct, and Eicher Road, which connects Roosevelt Road with Camp Horne just past the actual construction site. Eicher is so narrow at the bottom that it is a one way road down to Camp Horne.

It’s been reported that the Ohio Township Police have been stepping up patrols along Roosevelt Road to keep speeding and wrong-way vehicles in check. Safe, legal driving along unfamiliar, potentially over-used roadways is always a good idea.

Notification / Coordination – Allegheny County did themselves one better by closing Blackburn Road in Sewickley Heights between Thawmont Dr. and Country Club Road, on the same day as they closed Camp Horne.

The official detour for this closure is up Nevin Avenue in Sewickley – a densely populated residential neighborhood – to county-owned Waterworks Road, instead of the less developed but equally direct Glen Mitchell Road, which ends basically in the same spot in the Heights.

The closure of Blackburn Road in Sewickley Heights (Red X), with the county recommended detour along Nevin Ave. and Waterworks Rd. (in blue), and an alternate using Glen Mitchell Rd. (in yellow).              Google Maps

Generally, citizens and the media get about a one week or less advance notice of work being done by PennDOT or the county. While the logistical requirements related to contractors, etc. may be contributing factors to this, I can’t see any other reason to withhold information until such a short window exists, other than to prevent an organized outcry via mainstream and social media, or via outright protest.

PennDOT does deserve credit for their comprehensive 511PA website and mobile app, which provides information for state maintained roadways. Allegheny County provides visual and other project information via the robust County GIS website, which is comprehensive, current, and really useful.

As I’ve written about previously, what local jurisdictions do is very much hit or miss, and it hasn’t changed much in the nearly 4 years since my original post. Several weeks ago, I complained to PennDOT about an unannounced single lane closure of Route 65 south at the Haysville Light, where crews were replacing a traffic signal post.

A PennDOT representative replied that the work was being performed by a contractor for a local municipality, and they had NOT been notified of the work. They stated that the municipality would be reminded about their responsibility to communicate with PennDOT when doing work that impacts a state roadway.

Information and Advocacy – As much as the Internet has given numerous public and private entities the ability to receive, leverage, and distribute information about traffic disruptions in real-time, there really isn’t a comprehensive source that encompasses impacts on traffic by all of these entities – including utilities, tree service companies, and municipal authorities.

For me, the public roadways are critical infrastructure just like buried utility pipes or overhead power and telecommunications lines. As these deliver vital resources such as water, natural gas, and the Internet, and move waste products safely for treatment, our roadways move human and material resources to work, school, leisure, and the marketplace.

Any construction plans near buried utility lines requires a call beforehand to 8-1-1, the designated N-1-1 number for utility location services. Why shouldn’t any disruption to the normal flow of traffic require notification to a similar, publicly accessible information clearinghouse?

There are a few resources out there to help – one is the interactive, user-enabled traffic app Waze. I’ve been using this for several weeks now, and appreciate the timely updates from fellow motorists (and the ability to contribute myself), construction and delay information from PennDOT (which is an active participant), and accurate directions and drive times.

In other metro areas, apps like Waze are despised by residents in many neighborhoods for the ease in which shortcuts to avoid traffic and construction can be located – often through residential areas. I get the impression that these apps haven’t taken hold in Pittsburgh as much as elsewhere, but perhaps the frequent admonitions from PennDOT and others to stick to the posted detours is an indication that technology is giving commuters a viable tool in the battle against congestion.

There are, however, reasons for congestion that have roots in other issues than just the number of cars, and the inadequacy of many of our local road systems. It can be reasonably argued that roads like Camp Horne and Route 910 (through the greater Wexford metropolitan area) were not designed to handle the traffic associated with development activity that many consider excessive.

The inadequacy and expense of mass transit also contributes to the amount of vehicles on the roadways. I can take the bus to work – it takes 3 times as long, requires 2 transfers, and costs more than driving, as I can park for free. I feel for those who have to navigate this area without access to a vehicle.

I’m personally surprised that given the amount of time we spend commuting, and the expense involved in purchasing, maintaining, and insuring our vehicles, that an individual or group hasn’t stepped up to establish a regional platform for commuter information and grassroots advocacy.

One group that seems to come close to footing the bill is the National Motorists Association, which has been featured in the sidebar of this blog for several years. A brief statement about their history seems to sum it up very well:

The National Motorists Association was founded in 1982. We began by combating the 55-mph National Maximum Speed Limit and we continue to support efforts to retain motorists’ freedoms and rights. We support traffic laws based on sound engineering principles and public consensus — not political agendas.

The organization with which many are most familiar, the American Automobile Association, has a very robust exchange website that addresses numerous topics related to driver safety, along with encouraging government and industry to enhance the same. Their approach seems much different from that of the NMA, which paints many government efforts to improve safety as political affronts to both highway efficiency and individual liberty.

AAA wants to encourage motorists to obey posted speed limits and share the roadway with bicycles and other types of vehicles. NMA seems to support the same, but wants speed limits revised to the 85th percentile of prevailing speed as obtained via traffic studies – which means the limits may very well go up. NMA also opposes traffic calming, including the so-called Vision Zero initiative, which has in its toolbox something that has vexed Pittsburgh motorists in recent years – dedicated bike lanes.

<=>

Over this past weekend, PennDOT quietly opened a relief valve for some congestion with the resumption of normal traffic on Route 51 between the West End Circle and McKees Rocks after a three-year reconstruction project. This will likely take a lot of pressure off of northbound Route 65, which has often seen lengthy backups with commuters using it and the McKees Rocks Bridge as a detour.

That is, until the next construction project rolls around.

Contact information for PennDOT District 11, which covers Allegheny, Beaver, and Lawrence Counties, is available here. Allegheny County Public Works contact info is available here.

It’s also a good idea to keep in regular contact with your own municipality, to see when activities such as paving, utility work, and tree trimming are taking place. Ask them what efforts they are making to inform the community, and area motorists, in advance.

School’s Open – Drive Carefully.

Have a great month ahead.

Development Update – Billionaire Farmer, Treehouse Karma

It’s time to re-visit some of the topics I’ve written about concerning recent development and land use efforts in our local area. Some are still newsworthy, and are starting to generate more activity on the local government front. Others are continuing to serve as reminders of how government should be designed to serve We The People..or not.

Tull Estate Expands     

A few weeks ago while Leslie and I were walking the dog, a construction pickup pulled to a stop on Ferry Street in Leetsdale. The driver flagged through a flatbed semi carrying a large bulldozer, which then made the right onto Beaver and the left up Camp Meeting Road.

After seeing this, I got online and made a phone call or two, to confirm something that I had speculated about in a post from the beginning of this year.

Allegheny County property records show that two residences along Camp Meeting Road in Leet Township, along with some adjacent parcels of land, were sold in March and May of this year for just under $1.5 Million.

Three Rivers Trust is now the listed owner of 200 and 210 Camp Meeting – this is the same owner as the former Walker Estate, “Muottas”, purchased by Legendary Pictures CEO Thomas Tull in November 2015.

These purchases now link Mr. Tull’s existing property to Camp Meeting Road, and he has wasted little time in getting things moving..literally.

“Muottas” Gets Ready To Move

Earth-moving equipment transforms the driveway of 210 Camp Meeting Road into an access road back to the former Walker estate “Muottas”, and its new location on the property.

As I wrote previously, the access to Mr. Tull’s property from the Edgeworth side is extremely narrow and somewhat steep, unsuited for heavy construction equipment.

After driving past the above-pictured location and seeing the work in progress, I spoke with Leet Township Assistant Manager Betsy Rengers, who confirmed that permits have been obtained to grade a new access road from 210 Camp Meeting back to the site where the old house will be relocated to (which is in Leet), as well as building permits to prepare the site for the eventual move of the old house. Heavy equipment belonging to a house moving company has been seen traveling up and down Camp Meeting Road as well.

Driveway leading onto Tull property from Little Sewickley Creek Road side in Edgeworth, now gated off.

Leet Has Growing Pains

Along with the roadway creation and site preparation, Mr. Tull and his representatives are also moving quickly to secure the appropriate government approvals for other aspects of the construction project, such as water and sewer connections. A Leetsdale Borough official stated last week that sewer pipes from the new construction will eventually run under a roadway that goes through the Lark Inn Fields subdivision.

Infrastructure notwithstanding, there are additional development aspects of the project that are curious, and are drawing a curious response from some area residents.

This Monday, the Leet Township Zoning Hearing Board will hold what could be the first of several hearings on Mr. Tull’s request to obtain zoning variances to establish a “gentleman’s farm” on approximately 90 acres of his existing property in Leet.

According to Wikipedia –

A gentleman’s farm is a largely historic term for a property, of varying size, that is owned by a farmer traditionally know as a gentleman farmer…the largely historic term used to describe a country gentleman who has a farm as part of his estate and farms mainly for pleasure rather than for profit.  His acreage may farm any number of types of grains, poultry or other livestock. The estate can vary from under ten to hundreds of acres.

New fence going up along the property line for the Tull estate on the Edgeworth side.

Mr. Tull has also requested a variance to erect a fence completely surrounding the farm property.  As illustrated above, fencing appears to already be going up on the Edgeworth side of the property, which will presumably connect to the Leet side if approved – possibly resulting in the fencing off of the entire estate.

News about this proposal and the hearing was distributed to Leet residents, including those in the nearby Quaker Heights subdivision. I first caught wind of it through the neighborhood-based social media site nextdoor.com.

A June 28 post to the Quaker Heights neighborhood on that site included the following:

You should have received a yellow paper from the Zoning Board about a meeting on July 11 and I urge everyone up in Leet Twp to attend! On the right side of Camp meeting coming up the hill there is a large Farm that is trying to be developed which could affect all of us on top of the hill across from it and it beside us . We might end up losing a large plot of land for taxable income along with a lot of other issues from this so called farm that will affect all of us in Quaker Heights, (Buhlmont) Drive and Sewickley Highlands that none of us were aware of until now. PLEASE attend this hearing and tell your neighbors to attend as they plan on running chain link fence along Camp meeting to block the deer out which means our deer population will soar and we are losing valuable tax income from this property becoming a farm.

This type of community information or alert is almost expected when land use issues arise that may impact the perceived quality of life of a particular area or neighborhood. What makes this one different is that the person posting this “alert” is using the name Susann Hyjek – wife of Leet Township Manager Wayne Hyjek.

This is not to say that Mrs. Hyjek isn’t entitled to her own opinion, independent of her husband or his employer – but combined with the distribution of a meeting notice it does seem to expose an irony in comparison to other recent land use issues of note.

‘Equal Protection of the Laws’

Speaking of those issues, it was heartening to read the front page of last week’s Sewickley Herald and see Elise Truchan bringing her treehouse back to life in a place where the tender sensibilities of at least one neighbor, and the intransigence of Leet Township and its codes, aren’t as offended.

To try and put Mr. Tull and his proposals into proper perspective – they ain’t no 8th grader’s school project. Ample evidence of this is contained within the proposals listed in the Zoning Hearing Board notice, specifically the last one:

(3) If the variances are not granted, a challenge to the validity of the Township’s Zoning Ordinance adopted by the Leet Township Commissioners, on the grounds that the Ordinance allegedly does not properly address agricultural uses within the Township.

From the tone of this request, it sounds as if Mr. Tull is prepared to challenge any disapproval, possibly with legal action, for which it would appear he can very easily afford.

In short – Give me what I want, or I may very well litigate you into submission.

I anticipate that there will indeed be a healthy crowd when the Zoning Hearing Board convenes on Monday evening. The fact that they may muster a quorum, which they couldn’t bother to do when the Truchans paid for a hearing, may also show that they are taking this proposal seriously – which is entirely appropriate and proper for ALL citizens, not just the ones with deep pockets.

To add even more irony, July 9 marks the 148th anniversary of the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which includes the following:

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

It is the responsibility of Leet Township to give these proposals a fair hearing and review in accordance with existing law and regulations. Mr. Tull’s representatives, and those citizens present, will no doubt demand nothing less. It’s just a shame that those same due process requirements were at best given limited shrift in at least one previous case.

I hope that the township and its citizens come out of the process feeling better about it than the Truchan family did. If not, there will be some serious self-evaluation in order – probably around election time.

The outcome of that may be directly proportional to the amount of residential landscape vegetation consumed by displaced, migrating deer.

Have a good week ahead.

Our Hockey Year

I’ve gotten away from writing about things that myself and my wife enjoy together, or other aspects of our life as a couple – as parents, grandparents, and so on. The only exception to this is when our lives as individuals dovetail with something that is topical or newsworthy.

So it has been with the exploits of this year’s edition of the Pittsburgh Penguins.

As those of you who have been reading this blog over the years are perhaps painfully aware, my affinity for the Pens has been long-standing and well documented. Hockey is also something that my wife Leslie has been a fan of, since the days of her favorite player, Wayne Gretzky.

Since we’ve been following the Pens together, Leslie has focused on goaltenders, in particular Marc-Andre Fleury.  More about him later.

Over the past year, Leslie and I have done some interesting things related to our interest in the game, all without attending any actual games. We’ve talked about going to watch other local hockey teams like Robert Morris or the Wheeling Nailers, but couldn’t make any of them owing to all of those things that keep working grandparents running around.

For the second consecutive season, we didn’t make any Pens games either – owing to the cost of the games themselves as well as the associated trappings and logistics of a trip to Consol. We did find quite the suitable alternative for the season’s last game, however.

Our interesting year began last June. We made our second trip into Canada together, going up to Toronto for a day-long exploration of the Hockey Hall of Fame. The presence of the Stanley Cup is but one of the numerous educational, historical, and entertainment features of the hall, well worth a visit if you’re so inclined.

In September, the Pens offered tickets to lucky e-mail entrants to attend the first days of training camp at their new facility in Cranberry. Leslie and I got to take in the new facility and a couple of practice sessions.

While getting ready to leave, we ran into a fellow Quaker Valley alumnus, who was working security. He directed us to an area outside the building near the players’ parking lot. Fans were lined up near the driveway leading from the lot, in hopes that players would pull over and sign autographs.

One of those players was Marc-Andre Fleury. Leslie was fortunate enough to be in position when Mr. Fleury pulled up in his cream-colored Maserati, and signed things for a few people, including Leslie’s number 29 jersey.

While we found this to be an exciting and unique experience, we were both put off by some of the fans, and some of the players as well. There were some players who were truly genuine and outgoing – most notably Pascal Dupuis and Ben Lovejoy. The Pens will miss them both.

As this past season got underway in earnest, it appeared that Mr. Fleury was settling into a very familiar role, that of helping to keep the team competitive, through offensive droughts and defensive lapses, and at least somewhere near a playoff spot.

While GM Jim Rutherford was working his first piece of magic in replacing Mike Johnston with Mike Sullivan, Leslie and I were keeping an eye on other teams in the NHL, with particular interest in Western Conference teams and their goaltenders. We did this in part with my Christmas present from Leslie – a subscription to NHL Center Ice.

We got to watch several games involving our second favorite team, the Los Angeles Kings, and other games with teams you almost never see unless the Pens are playing them – such as the Calgary Flames, Winnipeg Jets, and my stepdaughter’s favorite team, the Ottawa Senators.

The Center Ice package also allows you to see how Canadian TV networks cover the NHL. This coverage has some noticeable differences from what we’re used to in the US. Most noteworthy for me was the amount that Canadian TV focuses on fans in the stands, such as the green men of Vancouver and other oddities.

As Rutherford and Sullivan began to work their magic on the ice and in the front office, players that we had grown to admire over the years departed for other places. Notable on this list is Rob Scuderi, traded to Chicago last December for Trevor Daley. I also miss Bobby Farnham, AKA “Mayhem”, who was picked up on waivers by New Jersey and wound up scoring at least twice on his old team afterward.

As the regular season proceeded toward its end, the increasing emphasis on youth and
speed, with veterans who could fit the bill interspersed with energetic rookies, coalesced into the well-oiled hockey machine that went the distance this year.

Uh, make that 4 Cups now.

In February, the Pens unveiled the logo design for their 50th season. This coincided with the 50th anniversary of Pittsburgh being granted an NHL franchise, and the design incorporated the then-three Stanley Cup championships the team had won.

I had initially wondered out loud if the Pens’ management and ownership had essentially given up on the 2015-16 season as a chance to bring home another Cup.

From the looks of it, the logo will need to be redesigned – a chore I’m betting that no one is complaining about.

The end of the regular season had almost a surreal quality to it – with the injury to Fleury in late March, the arrival and subsequent injury to Matt Murray, and starting the playoff run with Jeff Zatkoff in goal, backed by Tristan Jarry.

Leslie and I watched most of the playoff games apart, owing to work schedules. Those games we did get to see together were watched mostly at home. Like so many other fans, we ventured out for Game 5 of the Stanley Cup Final, and found all of the local sports-oriented watering holes to be packed to capacity. We then settled on a nice meal while watching the game amidst a very limited crowd at our favorite Chinese restaurant.

While we were crestfallen when the Pens didn’t clinch at home, I thought that the Pens having Bill Mazeroski on hand was a nice touch – just in case.

With that Game 5 loss came the Game 6 clincher in San Jose, on a Sunday night, one that I usually have off. When the Pens announced that they would host a watch party inside Consol Energy Center, we found ourselves inside a very cold arena with an awful lot of fellow fans watching a big TV.

The watch party experience was unique and somewhat enjoyable. We parked our car on the North Shore and took the T to Steel Plaza for the short walk to Consol. After the game, while the celebrations were getting under way across the city, thanks to the T we were back at our car in 30 minutes and home 20 minutes after that.

In the midst of the celebrations, we couldn’t help but notice Marc-Andre Fleury’s turn with the Stanley Cup. He was the 4th to hoist it, after Sidney Crosby, Trevor Daley, and Pascal Dupuis.

Fleury handled it a total of 10 seconds, if that – he made a few half-hearted turns, with the chalice only half-raised, before handing it off. Something was clearly amiss – perhaps it’s because he is likely more acutely aware of his situation than anyone else.

It’s clear that Matt Murray has cemented his position on the big club, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that he is completely ready for prime time. Murray has some problem areas that teams tried to exploit during the playoffs – most notably above the glove hand. That swarming defense that helped to insulate him from shots during the playoffs isn’t necessarily going to be there as much during the regular season, either.

The disturbing speculation about Fleury’s future on the team, accelerated by his over $5 Million salary and its impact on the team’s salary cap, has been a cause for consternation among many who realize this oft-overlooked truth – Without Fleury’s consistent play during the first half of this season, the Pens wouldn’t have had a chance to celebrate like this –

Sidney Crosby hoists the Stanley Cup to an appreciative crowd during the championship parade, June 15, 2016.

And with this, the unlikely saga of the Penguins’ spectacular season melts into the collective consciousness of the fans like soft serve ice cream in the summer heat. The maneuvers to create the 50th edition of this team for next season are already under way – let’s hope that the same combination of business acumen, solid management strategies, and excellent coaching and team-building will produce similar results.

As much as we wear our collective hearts on our sleeve with regard to certain players, we have to understand as well that the Penguins are not a philanthropic enterprise. To those who may disagree with decisions ranging from certain personnel moves to their handling of the development of the lower Hill District, those like myself, who have been following the team for over 40 of their 49 seasons, remember the bankruptcies, the incompetence, the uncertainty, and the unlikely rescue of the team by its greatest player ever.

The noise from the numerous, privately operated “fanboy” sites is something that we have largely ignored, if only because we don’t have the time to sift out all of the subtle nuances of hockey insight from what feels like Soap Opera Digest for a professional sports team. If I want that, I’ll have some fun and re-watch Slap Shot..for something like the 50th time.

There’s an irony about that movie that also plays into this hockey year. Johnstown, PA and its iconic War Memorial Arena (which served as home ice for the fictitious Charlestown Chiefs in the film) won the Kraft Hockeyville competition last year, with part of the prize being an NHL pre-season game in the refurbished arena.

 

In late September of last year the Pens took on the Lightning in Johnstown. As part of the festivities, lots of tie-ins to the movie were put forth – from Evgeni Malkin and others wearing Hanson Brothers glasses during warm-ups to Marc-Andre Fleury and Dan Potash from ROOT Sports recreating the opening scene of the film.

There’s an awful lot of irony to the fact that 10 months later, after a Stanley Cup-winning season, some of us can see Fleury in another scene from that movie – one not nearly as nice.

The Pens will be OK, and we will continue to follow them – and Fleury – wherever fate and finances may take them.

See you in September.

Quaker Valley: A Great Year Ends with Crash, Thuds

 

Quaker Valley High School held their commencement a week ago this past Monday. The district’s got a lot to celebrate, and a lot to be proud of. I could spend a lot of words highlighting many of the student and teacher achievements over the last school year, but the district has a full-time person who does that very well.

Among the things that impressed me this year were the ranking by US News and World Report, the refurbishing of the police car for the School Resource Officer, and the coverage the district received as part of a story on schools addressing the needs of transgender students.

Fortunately, the chemical spill at the High School this past Thursday wasn’t something that will have a long-term effect on the school or its operations. Unfortunately, other recent issues threaten to overshadow many of the above accomplishments in the eyes of students, parents, teachers, and the rest of the taxpaying public.

 

A long time before there were Internet memes, there were quotations. As vague and incomplete as both can often be, quotations can also be taken out of context or otherwise manipulated to serve the intended purpose or point of view of the ‘quoter’.

So it was with how Quaker Valley attracted national media attention in late May.

The local print media seemed to go in two different directions with their coverage. The Tribune-Review / Sewickley Herald provided a straightforward report of the incident, bolstered by interviews with both a student who selected one of the quotes to accompany his picture, and another who expressed dismay as a result.

The Trib then followed with an editorial chastising those involved in oversight for being “asleep at the switch“, while calling into question the High School history curriculum.

The Post-Gazette coverage from May 28 explored how deep concerns about the incident appeared to run with the parent and student population. The P-G reporter seemed to add a dash of snark to his reporting as well:

 (Communications Director Angela) Yingling was unable (to) say how these “offensive quotes” — as the school district’s email described them — made it past the editing process, nor could she say how the district will monitor the yearbook in the future.

It should be noted that the instructions given to seniors by yearbook staff, in the form of a letter found on the district website, offered little advance guidance relative to content:

Please submit one quote to be placed next to your senior picture in the yearbook. This quote must come from a respectable source (book, authoritative website, etc.) and cannot be your own nor your peers (absolutely no profanity). You also MUST cite the author.

No explicit prohibitions were made as to the author of a particular quotation, although I’m wondering what is meant here by “respectable“. The definition implies for me an attempt to steer students away from controversy, which is really not surprising.

Despite one student’s description of his actions as a joke, there are deeper lessons to be learned here, especially in this particular election year. Can we learn something from the seemingly harmless proclamations of those who were, and are, considered enemies of human rights, freedom, and dignity? How do the lessons of history translate to the choices we are being asked to make in a nation, and a world, increasingly connected, divided, and volatile – all at the same time?

My primary focus remains freedom of expression, within limits – and I don’t think those limits were exceeded in such a way as to sully QV’s reputation – at least not in a way they should be overly concerned about.

Similar sentiments were echoed by numerous QV alumni on social media pages such as Quaker Valley High School Friends and Memories of Growing Up in Sewickley.  A few of the comments started with the words “Much ado about nothing” – one alumnus went as far as to suggest that QV administration, through their response, exacerbated and perhaps invited the extra media attention.

I can’t speak for the current state of the history curriculum, but I do recall the history teachers during my time at QVHS. One of the interesting annual projects put together by the late Mr. Charles Hinds and his students was a display of covers and information about those designated as Time Magazine Man (now Person) of the Year.

The magazine’s criteria for this recognition is “a person, group, idea or object that ‘for better or for worse (emphasis mine)…has done the most to influence the events of the year'”.

Adolf Hitler received this recognition in 1938, Josef Stalin in 1939 and 1942.

I wonder what Mr. Hinds might have thought had he been approached by school administrators about excluding the above years from his display.

The response of the district to this year’s “joke”, along with whatever plans are afoot to reduce the possibility of a re-occurrence in future years, deserve careful scrutiny by those students (and those who advocate for them) whose history may be sanitized for the sake of reputation.

One person’s “reasonable” may be another’s revisionist.

 

For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.

        – H.L. Mencken

A pair of Herald reports detailed at least one family’s experience with head lice at Osborne Elementary, and presented evidence of all manner of misunderstandings – between parents and school leadership, between administration and the school board, and between those charged with monitoring student health and everyone else who perceives lice as a “serious” health issue.

The first report, dated May 24, appeared to originate from the assertions of a parent as relayed through school board member Gianni Floro. The district’s initial response to the possible scope of the problem was to state that it “doesn’t keep data ‘because lice is not something the district is required to report’ to any agency or department. 

Data that isn’t required for reporting purposes isn’t kept? Really? I wonder if that could be considered a form of plausible deniability.

For the story, QV Assistant Superintendent Andrew Surloff stated that the school environment is not the only one where head lice may be transmitted between children – an assertion dismissed by Mr. Floro. It was interesting/surprising/refreshing to see a board member and a district administrator disagree in a public forum.

Where Mr. Floro got his numbers to dispute Mr. Surloff’s assertion could be a matter for further discussion. Maybe that also explains why he took this issue public, considering the district’s initial response to his claims. I can’t believe that he didn’t try to address this first internally – the debate with Mr. Surloff on the pages of the Herald is uncharacteristic of the rarefied atmosphere that normally defines how QV operates.

This all apparently led to the district’s attempt at clarification and damage control, published in the Herald of June 2. Other QV administrators, including Superintendent Heidi Ondek, provided approximate numbers of recent lice cases and detailed the status of preventative efforts. These consist mostly of making parental notification, and providing information on seeking treatment that school personnel are not presently allowed to distribute or administer.

The story also attempted to establish from multiple sources the public health consensus that lice, while uncomfortable, contagious, and inconvenient, does not constitute enough of a problem to have kids miss school because of it.

Getting some parents on board with this line of thinking may be problematic.

 

A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history.

 – Mohandas K. Gandhi

Convincing local parents of some things has indeed been a challenge – most notoriously to stop dropping their kids off in front of the high school. It’s been over four years since the school district purchased two homes adjacent the building with the intent of creating a parking and drop-off area – a move met with ire and distrust by other neighboring property owners who felt they had not been adequately communicated with, and whose concerns were addressed harshly by the then-President of the school board. I wrote about this as it was happening, alongside another local land use controversy that by most accounts seems to have been amicably resolved.

According to another Herald story this past week, it appears that those concerns about safety and land use may be resurfacing, owing to the continued intransigence of parents and students to respect the rules of the road, combined with a perceived indifference on the part of the school district.

The current school board President, seemingly more comfortable with addressing what students put in the yearbook than their ignorance of traffic and safety requirements, seemed to shrug the whole issue off:

“Until those students and families take ownership of the safety issue, nothing’s going to change.”

The Leetsdale councilor that lives nearby, and has witnessed numerous near-misses, lamented, “I just think it’s going to be a matter of time and we’re all going to say we should have done something.”

With summer break now upon us, perhaps it’s time to re-think the approach of any community-based effort. First and foremost, the real concerns of residents need to be defined. Is this about safety in the area, or the potential loss of real estate to a future high school expansion?

Depending upon the answer, instead of posting a yellow sign in the yard I would be willing to don a yellow safety vest and monitor the front of the school in the morning or afternoon. I would document pedestrian and traffic violations, along with the license plate numbers of violators, and provide that information to those in authority, who would hopefully take the necessary corrective action.

Perhaps a consistently visible citizen presence, combined with a commitment from both school and borough to enforce what laws they can, may be enough to persuade our fellow citizens to drop and pick up their charges where it’s legal and safe to do so.

Our school district faces numerous challenges with a decent track record in recent years. Its reputation as a place to obtain an excellent public education enables a lot of good things to happen in our community, such as providing a foundation for strong communities to sustain themselves – and hey, real estate agents need to make a living, too.

With these recent hiccups, the potential exists for a more contentious relationship to develop between the school district and those well-educated alumni who are populating, and in many cases running, the communities making up the Quaker Valley. The specter of a tax increase doesn’t help.

The QV board, and the administration they employ to oversee district operations, would do well to remember who oversees them, and that a continued commitment to transparency, accountability, and meaningful, respectful dialogue is essential to gaining community buy-in for any future plans at the high school and other facilities.

 

The speed of communications is wondrous to behold. It is also true that speed can multiply the distribution of information that we know to be untrue.

– Edward R. Murrow

With that admonition, have a great summer.